We Looked at 100 Observations About Manhattan Hotels. Five Things Made Us Stop.
There are thousands of ways to analyse a hotel. Occupancy, room rates, reviews, satisfaction scores, location, amenities and complaints can all tell us something useful. But for a recent Stories of Business exploration, we tried something different. We collected 100 naturally occurring observations surrounding Manhattan hotel stays. We weren't trying to calculate what percentage of guests liked breakfast or how many complained about room size. We were looking for something else: things that made us stop.
Some of the observations seemed almost trivial. A family of four staying in a room with one chair. A traveller checking out in the morning but needing somewhere for their luggage until an evening flight. A guest accepting the absence of a microwave partly because inexpensive restaurants were downstairs. A housekeeper carefully arranging children's stuffed toys on a freshly made bed. A room-cooling problem that eventually became an elevator problem, a luggage problem and a time problem.
Individually, none of these observations proves very much. That is important. We were not treating individual experiences as representative evidence about Manhattan hotels. But when we began connecting them to other observations and to the wider system surrounding a hotel stay, they started producing questions.
What if part of a Manhattan hotel's product is actually Manhattan? Restaurants, pharmacies, subway stations, cafés, luggage-storage businesses and public spaces can all complete parts of the experience the hotel itself does not provide. The room may be sold by the hotel, but parts of the stay are being created elsewhere.
Then there was time. What if the stay is longer than the booking? A booking system may see checkout at 11am. A traveller with an evening flight sees another eight hours in New York. Luggage still needs somewhere to go. There may be work to do, food to eat, places to visit and an airport still to reach. The commercial transaction has ended, but the customer's journey has not.
Space produced another question. What does “sleeps four” actually mean at 7:30 in the morning? Four bodies may technically fit inside a room, but four people also arrive with suitcases, phones, clothes, breakfast, bathroom routines, work, children and the need to move around. A room can accommodate its stated number of guests without necessarily accommodating their lives.
We also noticed how easily one apparently small problem could travel through several parts of the hotel. In one observation, a room-cooling problem led towards maintenance and a proposed room move. That then collided with elevator delays, luggage and lost time. From inside a business, these may belong to separate departments and operating systems. To the traveller, they are simply one experience. It left us with another question we rather liked: your organisation has departments. Does your customer?
And then there was value. Hotels can spend substantial amounts on refurbishment, physical amenities, room categories and building infrastructure. Yet among the observations that caught our attention were remarkably small human interventions: a housekeeper arranging children's toys, staff improvising a work surface, luggage being held after checkout, an early room after an overnight journey and help arranging onward transport. These experiences are not equivalent, and they tell us nothing about which matters most. But they do raise an interesting question: can attention sometimes create value that capital expenditure cannot?
These became five signals: space, time, systems, life and value. Not five conclusions about Manhattan hotels. Five directions that made us curious enough to keep looking.
That distinction matters because it sits at the heart of something we have been developing at Stories of Business. Businesses already generate enormous amounts of data about customers, products and markets. But useful signals do not always arrive neatly packaged as data. Sometimes they appear in a workaround, a contradiction, an unexpected compliment, a tiny frustration or somebody using a product in a way nobody planned.
An insight does not always need to arrive carrying a conclusion. Sometimes its value lies in revealing a question that was previously invisible.
That is the thinking behind Stories of Business Insight. We start with observations, look for signals and then follow their connections through the wider system. The aim is not to manufacture certainty from fragments of evidence. It is to notice something interesting, ask why it might be happening, connect it to the wider system and identify questions or hypotheses worth exploring further.
Our first independent Insight applies that approach to Manhattan hotels. Manhattan Hotel Insights: The Hotel Room Is Only Part of the Stay brings together 100 observations, five signals and a series of questions we think are worth taking further. It is deliberately concise: a 14-page executive Insight rather than a lengthy research paper, designed to be read quickly, shared with colleagues and used to start conversations.
Because perhaps the most useful piece of insight isn't always an answer. Sometimes it is the question that makes you look at something familiar differently.
Comments